Comparing Matrix-Based and Graph-Based Representations forProduct Design

DSM 2010: Proceedings of the 12th International DSM Conference, Cambridge, UK, 22.-23.07.2010

Year: 2010
Editor: Wynn, D.C.; Kreimeyer, M.; Eben, K.; Maurer, M.; Lindemann, U.; Clarkson, P.J.
Author: Tilstra, A.H.; Campbell, M.I.; Wood, K.L.; Seepersad, C.C.
Section: Products and Architectures
Page(s): 195-206


Modern design problems can be supported with the use of product representations that go beyond geometrical models. Common product representation models can be generally classified as being matrix-based or graph-based models. Two such representations, the High Definition Design Structure Matrix (HDDSM) and the Component Flow Graph (CFG) have been developed independently by the authors. Theoretically, the differences between matrix representations and graphs are minimal because data can be stored and presented in a variety of ways. However, in practical applications in which software tools are being created to support new design methods, we have found that the choice between using a matrix-based or graph-based representation has implications for the way the product information is captured, evaluated, and used. In this paper we explore the benefits and limitations of the HDDSM (a matrix-based model) and the CFG (a graph-based model.) Based on our experiences, we provide a list of questions to guide the selection of an appropriate product representation format for new research in design methodology.

Keywords: Product Representation, Interaction Matrix, Graph Theory


Please sign in to your account

This site uses cookies and other tracking technologies to assist with navigation and your ability to provide feedback, analyse your use of our products and services, assist with our promotional and marketing efforts, and provide content from third parties. Privacy Policy.